Explaining Public Support for Vigilantism > Part 2

Single Wave Study

General Information

Title
Part 2
Project Number
29.2
Abstract
In October 2009, the LISS panel completed a questionnaire on general support for vigilantism, belief in a just world, and confidence in the justice system. This concerns the second measuring moment of the study 'Explaining Public Support for Vigilantism'. 

Panel members were assigned at random to one of two groups. This group assignment determined the order in which a panel member was presented three blocks of questions. The first group first answered questions about general support for vigilantism, then about belief in a just world, and finally about confidence in the justice system. The second group answered questions in the reverse order.  

In September 2009, the first questionnaire was administered to the same panel members that were selected for the second questionnaire.
Longitudinal Type
Single Wave Study
Begin date
05-10-2009
End date
28-10-2009
Researcher
Haas, Nicole
Publisher
CentERdata
Copyright
© 2010 CentERdata
Funding Organization
CentERdata/MESS Project
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17026/dans-zhw-8frv

Datasets and documentation

View Documentation

Codebook, in English
Codebook, in Dutch (original version)

Data Files

English SPSS file
English STATA file

Variables

Variable name Variable Label Variable Type
nomem_encrNumber of household member encryptedpreloaded
bj09a_mMonth in which questionnaire was completedconstructed
bj09a001Random distribution across two groupsconstructed
bj09a002Judges deal with people in a just manner.directly measured
bj09a003Verdicts reached by judges are carefully considered.directly measured
bj09a004I have respect for judges.directly measured
bj09a005The Public Prosecution Service deserves to be respected by citizens.directly measured
bj09a006The Public Prosecution Service is prejudiced.directly measured
bj09a007The Public Prosecution Service is successful in prosecuting the right people.directly measured
bj09a008The police are concerned for the well-being of all citizens.directly measured
bj09a009The police do not adequately protect citizens’ rights.directly measured
bj09a010If the police decide not to arrest someone, they will have good reasons for this decision.directly measured
bj09a011In the Netherlands, punishment for criminal offences is generally too light.directly measured
bj09a012Citizens can rest assured that their case will be treated correctly by the Dutch criminal justice system.directly measured
bj09a013The Dutch criminal justice system operates as it should.directly measured
bj09a014As long as you don’t harm anyone, it is acceptable to break the law.directly measured
bj09a015Judges do a good job.directly measured
bj09a016Judges are prejudiced.directly measured
bj09a017Judges deserve citizens’ respect.directly measured
bj09a018The Public Prosecution Service carefully considers the sentences demanded.directly measured
bj09a019The Public Prosecution Service is reliable.directly measured
bj09a020If the Public Prosecution Service demands a light sentence, it will have good reasons for doing so.directly measured
bj09a021Criminality is an issue that worries me a lot.directly measured
bj09a022The police take citizens seriously.directly measured
bj09a023The police are on hand when they are needed.directly measured
bj09a024I have no respect for the police.directly measured
bj09a025I have confidence in how laws are enforced in the Netherlands.directly measured
bj09a026The Dutch justice system is effective in countering crime.directly measured
bj09a027Sometimes it’s better to ignore the law and to solve problems yourself.directly measured
bj09a028You can count on judges to make decisions in the best interest of society.directly measured
bj09a029Judges are in touch with what’s happening in society.directly measured
bj09a030If a judge imposes a light sentence, he will have good reasons for doing so.directly measured
bj09a031The total amount of criminality in the Netherlands has increased sharply in recent years.directly measured
bj09a032You can count on the Public Prosecution Service to take decisions in the best interest of society.directly measured
bj09a033The Public Prosecution Service does a good job.directly measured
bj09a034The Public Prosecution Service does not adequately protect citizens’ rights.directly measured
bj09a035The police are reliable.directly measured
bj09a036The police are effective in countering crime.directly measured
bj09a037Orders by the police don’t always need to be obeyed.directly measured
bj09a038The Dutch criminal justice system is just.directly measured
bj09a039I have respect for the Dutch criminal justice system.directly measured
bj09a040The Dutch justice system does a good job of prosecuting criminals.directly measured
bj09a041In the Netherlands today, criminals are punished less severely than ten years ago.directly measured
bj09a042Judges are reliable.directly measured
bj09a043Judges do not adequately protect citizens’ rights.directly measured
bj09a044The Public Prosecution Service treats people justly.directly measured
bj09a045I have respect for the Public Prosecution Service.directly measured
bj09a046The Dutch justice system puts too much emphasis on offenders’ rights.directly measured
bj09a047The Dutch criminal justice system is reliable.directly measured
bj09a048You can count on the police to take decisions in the best interest of society.directly measured
bj09a049The police do a good job.directly measured
bj09a050Citizens that take justice into their own hands should always be prosecuted.directly measured
bj09a051If the government’s fight against crime is insufficiently successful, citizens have the right to take justice into their own hands.directly measured
bj09a052Some cases where citizens take justice into their own hands are justifiable.directly measured
bj09a053Citizens that take justice into their own hands are a danger to society.directly measured
bj09a054If the justice system fails to punish a criminal, I can understand that citizens take justice into their own hands.directly measured
bj09a055If the justice system fails to punish a criminal, I approve of citizens taking justice into their own hands.directly measured
bj09a056Citizens ought to take justice into their own hands more frequently.directly measured
bj09a057I do not approve of people taking justice into their own hands, no matter what the circumstances.directly measured
bj09a058I have the feeling that people get in life what they deserve.directly measured
bj09a059I have the feeling that people’s efforts are noted and rewarded.directly measured
bj09a060I have the feeling that it’s people’s own fault when things go against them.directly measured
bj09a061I have the feeling that the world is not a just place.directly measured
bj09a062I have the feeling that people treat each other with the respect that they deserve.directly measured
bj09a063I have the feeling that the world treats people justly.directly measured
bj09a064I have the feeling that people get what they are entitled to.directly measured
bj09a065I have the feeling that people are treated unjustly in life.directly measured
bj09a066I have the feeling thatthe world is a fair place.directly measured
bj09a067I have the feeling thatpeople treat each other justly in life.directly measured
bj09a068I have the feeling that people get the rewards and the punishments that they deserve.directly measured
bj09a069Was it difficult to answer the questions?directly measured
bj09a070Were the questions sufficiently clear?directly measured
bj09a071Did the questionnaire get you thinking about things?directly measured
bj09a072Was it an interesting subject?directly measured
bj09a073Did you enjoy answering the questions?directly measured
bj09a074Starting date questionnaireconstructed
bj09a075Starting time questionnaireconstructed
bj09a076End date questionnaireconstructed
bj09a077End time questionnaireconstructed
bj09a078Duration in secondsderived

Questions

Questionnaire: Vigilantism, questionnaire 2

The questionnaire was originally conducted in Dutch.

Browse Vigilantism, questionnaire 2

Response Information

Response Overview
Response:
Selected number of household members: 4383 (100.0%)
Non-response: 1678 (38.3%)
Response: 2705 (61.7%)
Complete: 2698 (61.6%)
Incomplete: 7 (0.2%)
Collection Events
Period
05-10-2009 to 28-10-2009
Sample
The same respondents as were selected for Part 1 (Random selection from panel members, age greater than or equal to 16).
Collection Mode
internet survey
Fieldwork Note
a reminder was twice sent to non-respondents

Publications

Public Support for Vigilantism: An Experimental Study Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8, pp. 387-413; Haas, N.E. et al.